From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 19 20:19:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A1316A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A0243D31 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:19:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (g4.samsco.home [192.168.0.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i6JKP1U8055276; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:25:08 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <40FC2C71.5090906@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:17:53 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <40FA8C5A.601@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adaptec 29160 as module (on amd64) ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 20:19:10 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Scott Long wrote: > > Hi, > > >>>Either I am missing something or ahc is not supposed to be >>>working as module (on amd64) ? >>> >> >>I don't know of any reason why the ahc driver would behave any >>differently on amd64 vs any other platform. Unfortunately, amd64 >>doesn't fully support kernel modules yet. This is rumored to be >>fixed in time for 5.3. > > > well it's working mostly ok here for other parts. > > So the ahc driver should work ok as module ? Then I suspect detection > of the 29160 fails :( > Is there a reason why you suspect this? The driver is designed to match Id's that are 'close enough', and a stock 29160 should have no trouble being matched. Please compile the driver into the kernel to rule this out. As I've said before, kld modules are not 100% working or supported on amd64 yet. Scott