From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jun 10 7:30:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from ingate.uk.neceur.com (ingate.uk.neceur.com [193.116.254.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9402315056 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 07:30:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jeff.Bond@nectech.co.uk) Received: from internal-mail.uk.neceur.com by ingate.uk.neceur.com id PAA04981; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:26:11 +0100 (BST) Received: from exchange.nectech.co.uk by internal-mail.uk.neceur.com id PAA23692; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:27:52 +0100 (BST) from exchange.nectech.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) id PAA23692 (2.4-8.8.8/3.1.31); Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:27:52 +0100 (BST) Received: by exchange.nectech.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:27:52 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Bond, Jeffery" To: "'Ladavac Marino'" , "'alan17@his.com'" , dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Partitioning the disk for FreeBSD Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 15:27:48 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yeah you are right. I'm getting the names reversed, but It is still true that FreeBSD divides a single partition table entry (slice in FreeBSD speak, partition in DOS/Linux), into sub-partitions. I think the naming is confusing. Surely, we should call the main partition a 'partition' and not a slice (same as everyone else), and then have some other name for the subdivisions that the disklabel editor creates. Regards, Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Ladavac Marino [SMTP:mladavac@metropolitan.at] > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 3:20 PM > To: 'alan17@his.com'; dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu > Cc: Jeff.Bond@nectech.co.uk; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: Partitioning the disk for FreeBSD > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: alan17@his.com [SMTP:alan17@his.com] > > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 1999 4:09 PM > > To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu > > Cc: Jeff.Bond@nectech.co.uk; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: Partitioning the disk for FreeBSD > > > > According to Doug White: > > > > > > How much RAM do you have? 75MB of swap isn't that much. Also, you > > want > > > more space in /usr than in /. > > I have 32 meg of RAM; my Linux swap is 64meg and works fine. > > What I want to do is put _all_ of the system onto my first > > partition, and put e.g. /home or /nerdstuff on my second big > > partition, where I will put my users(mostly me). Something > > that Jeff Bond wrote implies that I can't do that. > > > > I _certainly_ can't allow any install procedure to do any > > repartitioning > > of my new drive, since I already have stuff in the Linux part of the > > drive further on. If the FreeBSD install procedure insists on carving > > up my drive to suit itself . . . goodby to my plans of trying out > > FreeBSD > > > > > > Many thanks to the two who've replied, and I hope that others can help > > in > > this dilemma. > [ML] I think you have misunderstood: FreeBSD uses only one > (primary) DOS/Linux partition (FreeBSD calls this slice). It > repartitions this slice afterwards into its own partitions. So, if you > have reserved more than one DOS partition (slice) for BSD, and they are > contiguous, you can merge them together and install FreeBSD on that. > Normaly, there is always only one BSD slice on disk which is then split > into more BSD partitions. > > BSD does not touch other slices (but caution is nevertheless a > good advice). > > However, the DOS/Linux style partition (BSD slice) has to be a > primary partition: BSD cannot subpartition an extended DOS/Linux > partition. > > 64 Megs of swap may or may not be enough, depending on your job > mix: FreeBSD prefers keeping recently used pages (even if they are > clean) over the not so recently used dirty pages in cache; it also swaps > out clean executable pages out in idle periods so that an app needing > new memory does not need to wait for swapout. The result is that it > pages out (much) more aggressively than Linux, for example, but has much > better response under load and memory hungry apps. Naturally, when the > swap is short, it will throw away the clean buffers, degrading its > performance. > > /Marino To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message