From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 15 17:39:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA27248 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 17:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA27240; Thu, 15 May 1997 17:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA20164; Fri, 16 May 1997 10:50:43 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 10:50:42 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Pat McPartland cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, FBSD questions Subject: Re: 2.1.5 or 2.2.1 In-Reply-To: <199705151912.PAA22844@fireball.blast.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 15 May 1997, Pat McPartland wrote: > I am an ISP. I have to upgrade my webserver. Should I upgrade to 2.1.5 or > 2.2.1? I have the CDs, but I'm not sure which would be better. I was > thinking of upgrading to 2.2.1 since I have it, but I read a message in the > archives discouraging 2.2.1? Any advice? Don't use 2.1.5 - it has significant security holes. Use 2.1.7.1, or 2.2.1. If you can ftp 90 MB, grab the latest 2.2 from ftp://releng22.freebsd.org/pub/ Danny