From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 27 07:41:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4677516A41B for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:41:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC17513C47E for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 11045 invoked by uid 399); 27 Jul 2007 07:41:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2007 07:41:35 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <46A9A1A8.6000300@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:41:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Hatton References: <200707270712.l6R7CYs4064783@app.auscert.org.au> In-Reply-To: <200707270712.l6R7CYs4064783@app.auscert.org.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Philipp Wuensche , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: jail fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:41:36 -0000 Joel Hatton wrote: > Hi, > > I'm dredging up an old issue here, but it appears to be unresolved in > RELENG_5_5 at this time. The RELENG_5_5 tag is static, so nothing will change in it. You mention a patch version below however, so you should be aware that only the most crucial security fixes are ever applied to security branches. > In short, the jail_mount_fstab function is not given the fstab file on > which the local variables depend. This problem is fixed in RELENG_5, so if you were to upgrade to 5-stable you wouldn't have this problem anymore. You should also seriously consider upgrading to 6-stable at least, since fewer and fewer fixes will be backported to the 5.x branch as time goes by. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection