From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 8 21:15:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED98516A41B; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5FD13C4B0; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 21:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47337C79.2020201@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:15:37 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway , Matthew Seaman , Mario Lobo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200711081455.39635.cesar@expresso.com.br> <200711081448.48390.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> <20071108183239.GA65453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <4733633E.2050800@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20071108195436.GA67970@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <47337256.8040805@FreeBSD.org> <20071108210856.GA70286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20071108210856.GA70286@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: About Freebsd 7.0 versus 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 21:15:39 -0000 Roland Smith wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:32:22PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>>> You don't need to delete all the ports in one go and then reinstall >>>> them in another: running 'portupgrade -fa' will do the job. >>> Port upgrade tools are not guaranteed to work perfectly in this >>> situation. I tried doing an update with portmanager and ended up with >>> some binaries linked against both libc.so.6 and libc.so.7! Some ports >>> didn't even compile. >> portmanager isn't recommended for use since it became abandonware a long >> time ago and never reached maturity. If you (correctly ;) use portupgrade >> (e.g. -fa or -faP) then you will not have this problem. > > Dang, I meant portmaster, not portmanager. My bad. I would say that portmaster is still in the maturing phase also, although it has made recent progress. Kris