From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 30 19:48:36 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B53D537B401; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 47C8443FB1; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2D5792A7EA; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
In-Reply-To: <xzpllxr5r4t.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:48:36 -0700
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Message-Id: <20030501024836.2D5792A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/acpica OsdEnvironment.c
	acpi_machdep.c acpi_wakeup.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 autoconf.c
	critical.c dump_machdep.c elf_machdep.c exception.s genassym.c
	identcpu.c initcpu.c legacy.c locore.s machdep.c mem.c nexus.c
	pmap.c ... 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 02:48:37 -0000

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >   - I have tried to minimize looking at the NetBSD code, except in a couple
> >     of places (eg: to find which register they use to replace the trashed
> >     %rcx register in the syscall instruction).  As a result, there is not a
> >     lot of similarity.  I did look at NetBSD a few times while debugging to
> >     get some ideas about what I might have done wrong in my first attempt.
> 
> Any particular reason why you wanted to avoid using NetBSD code?

Because I was doing it for fun, and part of the fun was to see if I could
do it on my own.  And I wanted it to look more like FreeBSD than NetBSD.

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5