From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 23 21:40:08 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11E8106564A
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BE88FC16
	for <freebsd-standards@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1NLe8Jb010842
	for <freebsd-standards@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:40:08 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p1NLe84o010841;
	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:40:08 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:40:08 GMT
Message-Id: <201102232140.p1NLe84o010841@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org
From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: standards/149980: [libc] [patch] negative value integer to
	nanosleep(2) should fail with EINVAL
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:40:08 -0000

The following reply was made to PR standards/149980; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: standards/149980: [libc] [patch] negative value integer to nanosleep(2) should fail with EINVAL
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:38:02 +0000

 since this might break some ports or 3rd party applications, how about adding
 something like kern.allow_negative_sleep?
 
 cheers.
 alex
 
 -- 
 a13x