From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat May 18 12:15:43 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA15073
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 18 May 1996 12:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from haven.uchicago.edu (root@haven.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA15068
          for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 18 May 1996 12:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from woodlawn.uchicago.edu (root@woodlawn.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.9]) by haven.uchicago.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA01028; Sat, 18 May 1996 14:15:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from woodlawn.uchicago.edu (csdayton@localhost.uchicago.edu [127.0.0.1]) by woodlawn.uchicago.edu (8.7.1/8.7.2) with ESMTP id OAA14392; Sat, 18 May 1996 14:16:04 -0500 (CDT)
Message-Id: <199605181916.OAA14392@woodlawn.uchicago.edu>
In-reply-to: le@put.com's message of Sat, 18 May 1996 14:14:27 GMT
To: le@put.com
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Pine Ports
Reply-To: csdayton@midway.uchicago.edu
References: <199605181414.OAA05354@main.put.com>
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 14:16:03 CDT
From: Soren Dayton <csdayton@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Any particular reason 3.91 is still the current Pine port?
> Are the changes in 3.93 insignificant?

the developers called 3.92 a beta (and told people not to use it) and
3.93 has a bug that kills your terminal emulator if you have 24 lines
(and the developers tell you not to use it) Clever.  I think that I will
stick with MH.

Soren