Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:53:29 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 8398 for review
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020325155237.93360I-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203251223270.37073-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:

> ummmm... 
> 
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> > -	    suser_td(p))
> > +	    suser(p, 0))
> 
> is 'p' a thread pointer?

There is some evil driver compatibility typdef'ing to hide the difference
between thread and proc in device APIs using the same variable names, this
could be some of it. That said, not enough context to tell. 

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
robert@fledge.watson.org      NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020325155237.93360I-100000>