From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 17 15:10:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C81E16A41F for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:10:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlerota@iskon.hr) Received: from smtp.optima-telekom.hr (smtp.optima-telekom.hr [85.114.35.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71CC643D45 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:10:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mlerota@iskon.hr) Received: (qmail 62840 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2005 15:09:16 -0000 Received: from surf212.optima-telekom.hr (HELO redcloud.local) (85.114.34.212) by smtp.optima-telekom.hr with SMTP; 17 Aug 2005 15:09:16 -0000 From: Marko Lerota To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:09:37 +0200 Message-Id: <1124291377.80956.9.camel@redcloud.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: mail cluster with rsync X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:10:25 -0000 Gabriel Ambuehl writes: > It should be good enough for 2000 mail users (I can sync a machine with > about 700000 messages on it in less than an hour over 100mbit, it'd be > much faster even if there were SCSI disks in them). It kinda depends > MOSTLY many mails the hoard in their maildirs and how many new ones you get. I'll force them with quota so maildirs should be small and they have to delete mails from server after they pull them. And yes they will be scsi > By any means, rsync will put barely noticeable load on your system > compared to spamassassin and clamav. When I finish I'll put the documentation on mailing list. I dont know yet what to put for heartbeat. Probably dns and routing.