From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 13:02:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D81437B40E; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:02:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.physics.miami.edu (server.physics.miami.edu [129.171.61.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3545D43FAF; Mon, 5 May 2003 13:02:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ajhar@server.physics.miami.edu) Received: (from ajhar@localhost) by server.physics.miami.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h45K2br19515; Mon, 5 May 2003 16:02:37 -0400 To: andreas@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: ajhar@physics.miami.edu (Dr. Edward Ajhar) Date: 05 May 2003 16:02:37 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 4 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: apfilter and acroread X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 20:02:43 -0000 In the apsfilter port, is there a reason not to bump the acroread version to 5 or just to test for "acroread" alone instead of acroread4?