From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 15:20:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C8B16A4CE for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8810643D2F for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:20:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 20865 invoked by uid 1001); 31 Jan 2004 23:20:22 -0000 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 00:20:22 +0100 From: Michal Pasternak To: Yuri Grebenkin Message-ID: <20040131232022.GA20827@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About CD-RW X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 23:20:34 -0000 Yuri Grebenkin [Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 01:36:33AM +0300]: > Please give me a suggestion what brand or model to buy. > What CD-RW can be used under FreeBSD without problems? I never had trouble with: acd0: CD-RW at ata1-master PIO4 That's LG's 48/24/48 IDE CD-RW writer. Never damaged a CD during burn. I use it for about 1.5 year. > I use nVidia video card and really can't get it work properly 'cause of > broken drivers from nvidia.com I think. So I want to be sure. Also, I never had trouble with pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 That's ATI RadeOn 9200, which does wonderful hardware OpenGL with XFree86 4.3.0 drivers (no need to download binary & buggy drivers!). I use it for about 3 months and I don't want never ever to use NVidia cards. ATI is simply better, when you do some hw opengl on Unix. > And another little question. What is better to have both CD-RW and HDD on > one ata0 (master and slave) or HDD on ata0 and CD-RW on ata1? What gives > best performance? I think that best one is when they are on different, > bacause it become possible to only read via one and only write via other > while copying data. Is it that way? Many people told me, that it is the best to have them on separate channels, if this is possible.