From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 2 16:10:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6DA16A4CE for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D6A43D58 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:10:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i72GASnv061941 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:10:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i72GASIw061940; Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:10:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:10:28 GMT Message-Id: <200408021610.i72GASIw061940@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: docs/69086: Porters Handbook: How to convert from CR/LF to LF using REINPLACE_CMD X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David O'Brien List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 16:10:38 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/69086; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "David O'Brien" To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/69086: Porters Handbook: How to convert from CR/LF to LF using REINPLACE_CMD Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:04:19 -0700 On Sun, Jul 18, 2004 at 05:04:00AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2004-07-15 14:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > I therefore suggest including this in Porter's Handbook, as in > > attached patch. > > This looks like a very nice way to filter the sources to me. I'm not > very experienced with the way our ports system works though. > > Do the people on freebsd-ports agree about this change? In particular, > since he seems to be the most active ports committer that updates the > porters-handbook, does David O'Brien agree with this addition? I'm really not the most active ports committer updating the porters-handbook these days. I personally have no problems with the proposed changed. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)