From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 12:03:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872FA37B401 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826543F85 for ; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:03:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4MHeK3t000799; Thu, 22 May 2003 19:40:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Heiko Schaefer From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 2003 14:58:34 +0200." <20030520144927.I60060@daneel.foundation.hs> Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:40:20 +0200 Message-ID: <798.1053625220@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gbde performance question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:03:48 -0000 In message <20030520144927.I60060@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes: I just ran a real simple test on my laptop: critter# grep CPU: /var/run/dmesg.boot CPU: Intel Pentium III (651.48-MHz 686-class CPU) critter# dd if=/dev/ad0s1f bs=1m of=/dev/null count=10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10485760 bytes transferred in 0.501567 secs (20906000 bytes/sec) critter# dd if=/dev/ad0s1f.bde bs=1m of=/dev/null count=10 10+0 records in 10+0 records out 10485760 bytes transferred in 1.191878 secs (8797678 bytes/sec) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.