Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 01:30:10 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcl Message-ID: <19970625013010.RD29343@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970624183615.22918A-100000@Journey2.mat.net>; from Chuck Robey on Jun 24, 1997 18:38:56 -0400 References: <199706242222.PAA14433@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.96.970624183615.22918A-100000@Journey2.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Chuck Robey wrote: > I agree, tk wouldn't be added. I'd be happy yanking tcl out of the > sources. I guess I just didn't want to crosspost on this, yet. I might > bring it up on hackers, later. I don't think there are any scripts in tcl > that couldn't be in perl. The point for Tcl was rather that it could be used in things like the new sysinstall (and i think Jordan's serious about this now). Anyway, the existing version in /usr/src could/should probably be upgraded before actually going into use anyway. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970625013010.RD29343>