Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:16:53 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>
Cc:        dillon@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Vinum stripe size (was: tuning a VERY heavily (30.0) loaded server)
Message-ID:  <20010327171653.G1161@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010320111144.A51924@peorth.iteration.net>; from keichii@iteration.net on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:11:44AM -0600
References:  <20010320111144.A51924@peorth.iteration.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, 20 March 2001 at 11:11:44 -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> [Lengthy email, bear with me please, it is quite interesting.
> This box averages 30.0 load with no problems.]
>
> <snip>
>
> Average file size is about 4K.  /home/bbsusers* is on a vinum
> stripe'd volume with 3 Ultra160 9G 10000RPM drives on sym0 at stripe
> size 256K,  Greg: I know this should be a prime number,

No, there's no requirement for it to be a prime number.  The only
problem is that with 32 MB cylinder groups and a power of two stripe
size and subdisk count, you end up with all the superblocks on one
subdisk, which is a performance issue.  Choose the stripe size so that
the superblocks are roughly evenly distributed.

> can we safely use <150K stripe sizes?

Safely, yes.  But as somebody else has observed, you are probably disk
I/O bound.  Reducing the stripe size will tend to increase the disk
load, though probably not very much if your files are all 4 kB.  I'd
go for something like 273 kB stripes.

Greg
--
Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010327171653.G1161>