From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jun 13 19:25:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAF7340665 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 19:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49kncJ31rdz4Pf1 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 19:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [80.187.120.183] (helo=[172.20.10.4]) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jkBmI-0004rw-3i for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:25:18 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Subject: Re: Mailing List Etiquette was freebsd vs. netbsd Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 21:25:17 +0200 User-Agent: Dekko/0.6.20; Qt/5.4.1; ubuntumirclient; Linux; MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20200613154409.GA89618@neutralgood.org> References: <00225a04-237d-9051-9aea-12c192106a20@anatoli.ws> <373EDB20-C750-42E2-A41B-EA61F6E49807@kicp.uchicago.edu> <20200609120136.00005b3c@seibercom.net> <2393a1e0-b073-950a-78be-9f57d8e9934b@anatoli.ws> <20200610063555.00003707@seibercom.net> <82F57D0D-E0EC-49F7-824E-20A296C9F549@kicp.uchicago.edu> <250b853a-b436-0e99-b05c-9abd6b6019ef@panix.com> <7018FA7A-32A6-4567-AA5D-1A90FF5FFF6C@kreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 80.187.120.183 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49kncJ31rdz4Pf1 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of guru@unixarea.de has no SPF policy when checking 178.254.4.101) smtp.mailfrom=guru@unixarea.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.40 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[178.254.4.101:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[unixarea.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.88)[0.883]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.70)[0.704]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.02)[1.016]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42730, ipnet:178.254.4.0/24, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[178.254.4.101:from] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 19:25:21 -0000 On Saturday, 13 June 2020 17:44:09 CEST, Kevin P. Neal=20 wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:09:43PM -0600, @lbutlr wrote: >> On 10 Jun 2020, at 11:54, doug wrote: >> > See=20 >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#id= p44832888 >>=20 >> Seems very out of date too me. For example the first thing it=20 >> says is to wrap messages at 75 characters because not everyone=20 >> uses GUI mailers. This may have been relevant in 1995, but it=20 >> sure isn=E2=80=99t now. CLI MUA=E2=80=99s handle long lines just fine. > > If you had wrapped at 75 characters then the quoting would be much easier > to read. Yes, I always do so. And this has todo with the normal terminal line length of 80 chars, which in turn has todo with the old 80 column punch cards. matthias --=20 Sent from my Ubuntu phone http://www.unixarea.de/ NO to the EU! NEIN zur EU!