Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 07:05:49 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to build a new mail server Message-ID: <87zlq73yoy.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <48401F97.9010003@pixelhammer.com> (DAve's message of "Fri, 30 May 2008 11:39:03 -0400") References: <483EE95F.8000509@studsvik.com> <483FAD90.6010101@extracktor.com> <484013A7.6020507@mikestammer.com> <48401F97.9010003@pixelhammer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:39:03 -0400, DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com> wrote: > Eric Zimmerman wrote: >> heres some interesting reading about qmail... >> http://www.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html > > That so much time and effort is spent telling everyone how bad qmail > is still amazes me. It is one of the best performing and most > extensible MTAs I have ever used. It is not however, suitable for > those who choose not to understand how mail works. Point and clickers > should stay with Postfix, also a very capable MTA. This freebsd-questions thread is approaching a low signal/noise ratio very very fast. MTAs are a hotly debated subject, and they tend to spark the flames of a religious war *very* fast. Can we _please_ try to steer this discussion back on track, and actually _help_ the original poster, instead of showing that in a dick size war we can definitely 'win' by our elite administrator skillz? Please?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87zlq73yoy.fsf>