Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:21:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: best archiver? (for music) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903140720170.36360@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org> References: <20090313191520.GA14233@thought.org> <20090313202226.GA47453@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903132128460.33043@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090314030558.GB25027@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> lame -h -b 96 - i was able to tell the difference on every song, but it >> wasn't really huge deal. > > > > hm. oh, yeah, my new box has to have a superior soundcard. and > i'll pony up for even better speakers too. (so when i'm ready, > i'll ask what's best. maybe find something on ebay.) > > my hearing is exceptionally good and while call myself an > audiophile, having all my tunes right here at fingertips is i don't call myself audiophile (rather opposite, but i have normal hearing), just wanted to point out how much is really enough. do use -h -V 3 when compressing. > a major win. having said that, can you point me to a basic > tutorial on lame? i've got 1581620 blocks of mp3 @ 128kbit. > lectures. when i tried to cut the quality even by a bit it was > evident immediately. rar compresses these file to > 1482404 blocks very very slowly. it probably makes sense to just > burn the mp3 files to a dvd and be safe. > > > > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > The 2.23a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903140720170.36360>