Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:23:11 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: ptrace equivalents between freebsd and linux? Message-ID: <200702071323.11545.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070130195917.GA7585@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20070130195917.GA7585@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 30 January 2007 14:59, Steve Kargl wrote: > MPICH2 has the ability to use shared memory as one of > its communication channel. Unfortuantely, the build > dies with an error realted to ptrace. In looking at > a linux manpage for ptrace, I've identified that the > linux PTRACE_ATTACH and PTRACE_DETACH are equilavent to > out PT_ATTACH and PT_DETACH. The build dies later with > a problem with PTRACE_PEEKDATA. Is our PT_READ_D the > right equivalent? Most likely. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702071323.11545.jhb>