From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 4 15:51:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA10810 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:51:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from nash.pr.mcs.net (nash.pr.mcs.net [204.95.47.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA10790 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:51:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alex@nash.pr.mcs.net) Received: (from alex@localhost) by nash.pr.mcs.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) id RAA06000; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:49:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from alex) Message-ID: <19980804174928.H29720@pr.mcs.net> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:49:28 -0500 From: Alex Nash To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: Satoshi Asami , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xacc/gnucash Mail-Followup-To: obrien@NUXI.com, Satoshi Asami , ports@freebsd.org References: <199807312108.OAA13993@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> <19980731162131.B9885@pr.mcs.net> <19980804114701.D702@nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19980804114701.D702@nuxi.com>; from David O'Brien on Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 11:47:01AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386 X-Mutt-References: <19980804114701.D702@nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 04, 1998 at 11:47:01AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > I guess the first thing to do is decide which name should stay. My > opinion is "gnucash" because that is the name that will be lasting. > "xacc" will go way once gnucash is stable. That's why I went with that > name, for what is esentually "xacc". I'm not all that attached to keeping xacc. CVS rules: David, since you created the conflict by being the second one to commit, I'll leave it up to you to resolve as you see fit. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message