Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:04:39 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: hubs@freebsd.org Cc: dl@leo.org Subject: Re: CVSup upgrade to fix the timestamp bug Message-ID: <200109102004.f8AK4do51571@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20010910124906.E46870@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> References: <XFMail.010909102935.jdp@polstra.com> <20010910124906.E46870@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20010910124906.E46870@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>, Daniel Lang <dl@leo.org> wrote: > > The ports and packages are not updated yet. I'll do that next. > I've seen a change in two patch-files for the cvsup port. > Does this mean, cvsup may now again be built from the ports ? Yes. > Since this is no snap, but a p2 release, would you rather > recommend the port-release or the snap from the sources, > you made public on the S1G page ? I guess it probably > doesn't matter much. I recommend the "net/cvsup-devel" port. It is a port version of the snapshot that is on the S1G page. The snapshot is better because it includes many minor bugfixes that the release doesn't have. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109102004.f8AK4do51571>