Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 08:16:39 -0800 From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> To: Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@anongoth.pl> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r526232 - head/x11-wm/hikari Message-ID: <3ac58a2c-ecb7-7614-707e-bb591f29dc23@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <20200216104806.GA80117@KGPE-D16> References: <202002151802.01FI2w9m044102@repo.freebsd.org> <81a9cfc3-f1e2-f506-a5d0-fc95d57686f9@rawbw.com> <20200216104806.GA80117@KGPE-D16>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2020-02-16 02:48, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > Is it necessary even for trivial build fixes? If this is an unbreak - then you can commit it and 'Approved by' should be 'portmgr'. If this is some formatting or trivial fix (license/NO_ARCH/helpers/WWW) - then you can commit it and 'Approved by' should be 'portmgr blanket'. Otherwise you should ask the maintainer. But the 'Approved by' line, I think, should always be present when MAINTAINER is not you and not ports@ Best, Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ac58a2c-ecb7-7614-707e-bb591f29dc23>