From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 19 09:36:43 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7245F106564A;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B848FC08;
	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:36:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
	(envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
	id 1QuLVW-000PEY-GV; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:36:54 +0400
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:36:54 +0400
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20110819093654.GC92576@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <slrnj4oiiq.21rg.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>
	<1144162985.20110818235011@serebryakov.spb.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1144162985.20110818235011@serebryakov.spb.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:36:43 -0000

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:50:11PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:

> > 8) There is no -STABLE supported branches in ports.
>   I want to be more precise here: not -STABLE, but all -RELEASE
> branches, where "upstream" version of ports/packages never changes,
> and only security bugfixes are backported.

But when?
"Soft" version depend is best, IMHO.

-- 
Slawa Olhovchenkov