Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:36:54 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve Message-ID: <20110819093654.GC92576@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <1144162985.20110818235011@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <slrnj4oiiq.21rg.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> <1144162985.20110818235011@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:50:11PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > 8) There is no -STABLE supported branches in ports. > I want to be more precise here: not -STABLE, but all -RELEASE > branches, where "upstream" version of ports/packages never changes, > and only security bugfixes are backported. But when? "Soft" version depend is best, IMHO. -- Slawa Olhovchenkov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110819093654.GC92576>