From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 2 10:59:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA12078 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 10:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from david-relay.siemens.de (david-relay.siemens.de [139.23.36.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12073 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 10:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from salomon.mchp.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david-relay.siemens.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA03511 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:56:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by salomon.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA10098 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:59:20 +0200 (MDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA11196 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:59:18 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199710021759.TAA26440@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Subject: Re: Apache works but dies with signal 11, why? In-Reply-To: from Tom at "Oct 2, 97 10:50:23 am" To: tom@sdf.com (Tom) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 19:59:06 +0200 (CEST) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm posting this to -STABLE and -PORTS since I don't know > > where the problem lies actually. > > > > I have a funny problem with apache on 2.2-STABLE (most up to > > date version): > > > > Everything works, but when apache exits (it is run from inetd), > > it always dies with signal 11 when work is done. This happens > > Does Apache even work from inetd anymore? As I recall, you used to have > to add stuff in the config files to do this. But I thought that inetd > support was going to be dropped. > Yes, I have to change the config file (ServerType inetd). I also have it running on a Sun (4.1.3_U1) from inetd without any problems. > I would run it daemon mode. It is considerable faster, and places less > load on your system. Yes, but the servers are used rather seldom and only in our local network. So I didn't want to have a daemon running when it is only used 20-30 times a day... I think, I am doing something wrong because nobody else complains about that (Or are there no other users running it from inetd ?). It's the same configuration as on the Sun (apart from some directory configuration). Thanks, -Andre