From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 16 12:14:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A782D37B401
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu
	[128.84.231.97])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A13B43F75
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu)
Received: from saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu (saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu
	[128.84.249.196])h5GJEGxi020370;	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:14:16 -0400
Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost)h5GJEGtE022060;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:14:16 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:14:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mitch Collinsworth <mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu>
To: Dave <mudman@metafocus.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030616105955.U11598@metafocus.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.51.0306161512080.19398@saruman.ccmr.cornell.edu>
References: <20030616105955.U11598@metafocus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: POP daemon
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:14:18 -0000


On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Dave wrote:

> What I mean by good is 'secure as possible' (is there really such thing as
> being totally secure / invulnerable?)

Yes.  It's called "not connected to the network, in a bomb-shelter,
with an emergency generator, with plenty of fuel".

-Mitch