From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 9 18:28:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DAE16A415 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from FS.denninger.net (wsip-70-169-168-7.pn.at.cox.net [70.169.168.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9040B43D88 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 18:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.6/8.13.1) with SMTP id k89ISV6R032046 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:28:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from karl@FS.denninger.net) Received: from fs.denninger.net [127.0.0.1] by Spamblock-sys (LOCAL); Sat Sep 9 13:28:31 2006 Received: (from karl@localhost) by FS.denninger.net (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k89ISVv5032044 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:28:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from karl) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2006 13:28:31 -0500 From: Karl Denninger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060909182831.GA32004@FS.denninger.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060909173813.GA1388@FS.denninger.net> <200609092023.16454.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609092023.16454.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers cheerfully broiled for supper and served with ketchup! Subject: Re: ARRRRGH! Guys, who's breaking -STABLE's GMIRROR code?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 18:28:35 -0000 Yeah, -STABLE is what you should run if you want stable code, right? C'mon guys. This sort of thing belies a total lack of concern when changes are MFC'd into production branches of the code. This kind of thing is expected if you're running -CURRENT, but not -STABLE. How long would it have taken to actually test the change and detect this once it was put in? All of 30 seconds? -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 08:23:10PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > On Saturday 09 September 2006 19:38, Karl Denninger wrote: > > This is not cool folks. > > Want a refund? > > -- > /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org > \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 > X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet > / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News