From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 1 20:33:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5819A16A403 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (kozubik.com [69.43.165.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F64413C455 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from kozubik.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kozubik.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l31KXhks032724; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Received: from localhost (john@localhost) by kozubik.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id l31KXhBL032721; Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@kozubik.com) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT) From: John Kozubik To: Scott Robbins In-Reply-To: <20070401201443.GB87286@mail.scottro.net> Message-ID: <20070401133040.S35599@kozubik.com> References: <20070401121154.O35599@kozubik.com> <20070401201443.GB87286@mail.scottro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bounty and timeline on vmware 5.x on FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:33:42 -0000 On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 12:34:34PM -0700, John Kozubik wrote: > > > > I have been running FreeBSD as my primary workstation OS for 8 years now. > > > > Vmware workstation is an absolute requirement for my work, and thus I have > > been limping along on an old copy of Vmware Workstation 3.x for Linux run > > in binary compat mode on FreeBSD 4.x. [1] > > I wonder if you, and others willing to add to the bounty (I might be > one, and have passed this on to someone else who might be another) might > be better off considering vmware-server, rather than workstation. > Depending upon needs, (mine is to simply have a working Windows > installation, only to run a few relatively undemanding programs) it > might be sufficient--also, it is free at present. (As in Free Diet > Mountain Dew). In my case, workstation is required - not only for actual functionality, but for simplicity of home network topology and total systems running out of my closet, etc. I'm trying to decrease both as the years go by... Further, there are proposed functions of vmware workstation, specifically the 3d emulation, gaming, etc., that would be very nice to have working.