From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb  5 05:38:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D016A4CF
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Feb 2004 05:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [212.43.217.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3674143D1D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  5 Feb 2004 05:38:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mat@mat.cc)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 04250555413; Thu,  5 Feb 2004 14:38:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from andromede.faubourg.reaumur.net
	(ATuileries-107-2-1-195.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.120.195])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0C6DA555410; Thu,  5 Feb 2004 14:38:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:38:13 +0100
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc>
To: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jb.quenot@caraldi.com>,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <245776312.1075991893@andromede.faubourg.reaumur.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040205111104.GA21102@pc61.anyware>
References: <1075796985.964405.22320.nullmailer@sinanica.lg2a.datamax>
 	<xzpbrog8p3z.fsf@dwp.des.no>
 <402010B4.2000200@mac.com>	<xzpr7xamm1h.fsf@dwp.des.no>
 <20040205020115.GA3204@moo.holy.cow> <20040205111104.GA21102@pc61.anyware>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.1 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1
cc: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Subject: Re: SIZE in distinfos causes failure with FETCH_CMD=wget
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 13:38:27 -0000



+-le 05/02/2004 12:11 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Quenot =E9crivait :
| * parv:
|=20
|> in  message  <xzpr7xamm1h.fsf@dwp.des.no>, wrote  Dag-Erling  Sm=F8rgrav
|> thusly...
|>=20
|> > Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> writes:
|> >=20
|> > > Or a way  of setting the maximum bandwidth permitted  for fetch to
|> > > use.
|> >=20
|> > man dummynet
|>=20
|> So, one have to abandon ipf for ipfw?
|=20
| AFAIK you can use ipf as firewall and ipfw for limiting bandwidth.  They
| do not conflict with each other.

Or you can go for pf/altq which works pretty well if you're using 5.x :)


--=20
Mathieu Arnold