From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Oct 27 14:22:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from aspenworks.com (aspenworks.com [192.94.236.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11C137B479 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 14:22:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aspenworks.com (hh1127215.direcpc.com [206.71.127.215]) by aspenworks.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id e9RLMUn03653; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:22:31 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <39F9F1FE.9945948E@aspenworks.com> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 15:22:06 -0600 From: Alex Reply-To: alex@aspenworks.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Housley Cc: free Subject: Re: Earthlink's new policy blocks port 25 References: <39F9E05E.2C64C92D@aspenworks.com> <39F9E97A.62AD3FFB@thehousleys.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Great idea.. *s James Housley wrote: > > Alex wrote: > > > > I don't see the option in Netscape to specify a port number for their > > smtp server, however, it is an option in Outlook. > Some do, some dont. Have you tried smtp.server.com:26 ?? > > > > Anyone running their smtp server on a port other than 25? > > > My mother uses mindspring and sends throught my mail server. Because of > the port 25 block I have an ipfw forward rule from port 26 to port 25. > And that works fine. > > Jim > > -- > jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve > jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature > to help me spread! <- Save this lifeform ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message