From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 18 21:06:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0A616A422 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:06:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F121543D4C for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 19874 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2005 21:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 18 Sep 2005 21:06:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 19957 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2005 21:06:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 18 Sep 2005 21:06:14 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0793B115F6; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:06:10 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:06:10 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050919000610.381d93db@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20050918205816.GA17932@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200509182034.j8IKYCUv065506@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050918234714.41544927@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20050918205816.GA17932@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Clement Laforet , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/portmk/Mk bsd.apache.mk bsd.database.mk bsd.java.mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.post.mk bsd.port.pre.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk bsd.tcl.mk ports/devel/portmk/scripts distfiles.sh options.pl options.sh ranksites-fping.pl ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:06:19 -0000 On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:58:16 -0400 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 11:47:14PM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 20:34:12 +0000 (UTC) > > Clement Laforet wrote: > > > > > clement 2005-09-18 20:34:12 UTC > > > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > > > Modified files: > > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.port.mk bsd.port.subdir.mk > > > Added files: > > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.apache.mk bsd.database.mk > > > bsd.java.mk bsd.tcl.mk > > > Removed files: > > > devel/portmk/Mk bsd.port.post.mk bsd.port.pre.mk > > > devel/portmk/scripts distfiles.sh options.pl options.sh > > > ranksites-fping.pl ranksites-geoip.pl > > > Log: > > > - Sync portmk with next exp-build patchset. > > > > Many thanks. Can we assume that from now on we'll have in this port > > the next set of changes one-two weeks before they'll be in the > > base ? > > This time it will be at least 1-2 weeks because we can't actually > commit the changes until 6.0 is out, but I don't know if we'll be able > to do this in future, because this would actually introduce delays > into the schedule, which really isn't something we need. > > Typically when one of us has time to run a test build, the changes are > selected then and put into testing almost immediately, with the > results known within a day or two. Waiting before starting the test > would run the risk of losing the window of availability to run the > test build, and waiting afterwards would allow new errors to creep in. What I would like is to have access to the "next set of changes" so that I can catch any problems I might have with my scripts that sometimes make use of "unsupported" features of *.mk Even 2-3 days would help. > > > - Remove temporarily all eik's work. We'll try to find a decent > > > way to deal with major changes. Of course we'll reuse his good > > > ideas > > > > The ranksites* part would be very useful. > > If you'd like to work on separating out those changes into a discrete > patch that can be tested, that would be great. It's for a long time on my to-do list (but what I have now won't do) and there are also others interested so who knows, maybe something good would come out eventually. :) -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"