From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Sep 9 16:30:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2070237B422; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 16:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id QAA46086; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 16:30:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 16:30:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steve Price Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , Neil Blakey-Milner , Will Andrews , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Ports Options Paper Message-ID: <20000909163043.A45681@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20000903052226.E1205@radon.gryphonsoft.com> <200009082243.e88Mh9V05579@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000909020702.A64259@mithrandr.moria.org> <20000909044544.B67715@mithrandr.moria.org> <20000909162225.D2089@bonsai.hiwaay.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20000909162225.D2089@bonsai.hiwaay.net>; from sprice@hiwaay.net on Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 04:22:25PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 04:22:25PM -0500, Steve Price wrote: > I'm wondering if it would be beneficial to setup a mini-CVS tree with > a couple of ports that we can hash our ideas out on. I think it would > be easier to share our code anyway. Comments? I was just thinking the same thing..it is going to get difficult with all the bsd.port.mk patches flying around otherwise. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message