From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 3 15:42:41 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA03677 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co ([200.21.26.198]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA03621; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 15:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by biblioteca.campus.unal.edu.co (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA29876; Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:39:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Jul 1996 17:39:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni S." To: Gary Palmer Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Please, please...(and a lab) In-Reply-To: <11300.836432541@palmer.demon.co.uk> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 3 Jul 1996, Gary Palmer wrote: > smrsh is part of sendmail 8.7.x, although we don't install it by > default. I believe there is eevn a m4 configuration file option to > default to smrsh, but I can't remember offhand. Try looking in either > -stable or the sendmail 8.7.5 distribution for more information. > > Gary > -- > Installing it by default is worth it: the same crackers (I assume) also broke into AIX4.1, and Solaris 2.4, both considered secure mailers by CERT, and the local admins closed every other potential door; rsh, rlogin, tftp, finger, etc... I am experimenting, before I reinstall the system: I am using tcp_wrappers to cut all local (.co) and unknown mail. Of course that meant running sendmail in inetd. I even cutted out the mail from one machine to see if they can get through...its the only way of learning:) best regards, Pedro.