From owner-freebsd-arch  Tue Jul  4 11:15:49 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC8C37BA28
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Jul 2000 11:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 139XEC-00053v-00; Tue, 04 Jul 2000 20:15:24 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: truncate(1) implementation details 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 2000 02:37:39 +1000."
             <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007050235360.16757-100000@besplex.bde.org> 
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 20:15:24 +0200
Message-ID: <19462.962734524@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Wed, 05 Jul 2000 02:37:39 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:

> Something about EXIT_SUCCESS, EXIT_FAILURE and stdlib.h.

So you think that EXIT_{SUCCESS|FAILURE} should be used exclusively, and
not the values described in sysexits(3)?  I'm not criticising (I realize
that the English is ambiguous here), I just want to know what your
standpoint is.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message