From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 17:49:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BF416A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:49:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2979543D1D for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:49:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cvance@chrisandkaren.net) Received: from chrisandkaren.net ([68.55.156.112]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004071517490001600ba764e>; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:49:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (cvance@localhost) by chrisandkaren.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id i6FHkvc51372; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:46:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cvance@chrisandkaren.net) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:46:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Vance To: Harald Schmalzbauer In-Reply-To: <200407080339.14639@harryhomeworkstation> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -current mysql error X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:49:03 -0000 Is this the problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/62845 "update of mysql40-server causes mysqld to segfault on remote connection" I've been following this specific issue and don't think it's fixed yet. If you are having exactly these symptoms, my temporary solution was to remove libwrap from the compilation of mysql-server. chris. On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hi all, > > is it possible that a -current bug causes 'mysql -h this.host.tld' to fail? > On a 5.2.1-p6 system it's working with mysql40. > On my -current from 26. May it fails with mysql40 and mysql41. > > Both run inside jails! > > Is it possible that it has something todo with pthread made the standard > threading library and the port must be fixed? > > Thanks, > > -Harry >