From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 01:50:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1721065670; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from adsum.doit.wisc.edu (adsum.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8F58FC12; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:50:42 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth1.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth1.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) id <0LIA00C007SIZP00@smtpauth1.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:50:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from comporellon.tachypleus.net ([unknown] [76.210.65.155]) by smtpauth1.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0LIA001RP7SGB010@smtpauth1.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:50:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 20:50:40 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn In-reply-to: To: Daniel O'Connor Message-id: <4D840BF0.9030904@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Report: AuthenticatedSender=yes, SenderIP=76.210.65.155 X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-10, Version=5.6.0.2009776, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.3.19.13318, SenderIP=76.210.65.155 References: <201103151327.p2FDRZPK044315@svn.freebsd.org> <1300198773.87705.25.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <4D7FA14C.8040205@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110305 Thunderbird/3.1.9 Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gavin Atkinson , src-committers@freebsd.org, Ben Kaduk Subject: Re: svn commit: r219667 - head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 01:50:43 -0000 On 03/16/11 01:25, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On 16/03/2011, at 4:14, Ben Kaduk wrote: >>> is wise to others. It's a little bit of a pain on the implementation side, >>> since you can't turn it on from newfs, but that isn't a serious obstacle. >> I suspect the consensus of people like -arch and -fs will be that the >> burn-in time before it is considered sufficiently stable is be >> measured in years. > Which is a good reason to have a UI to set it :) > > Or maybe when you say "auto" it asks if you want it on or not. Yes, there should be a UI for sure. Just ENOTIME so far. -Nathan