From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 21:42:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A223416A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:42:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5157D43D1D for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:42:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dettloff@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so168390rnb for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:42:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Lk2naZRHzGly6Kq4H2fTxFs2DjRowJoD80oASTMmPA4DQw3r0mAWAP/BkIm4mqG/hpgTC7wLpJIQGBgYiVHjuca2deBxJYA/fpw6os2NL0+nrh7eqi9LddHQhmKr/z85g9IUEli7g0XdEP0dx1zYg7hMAfLCFZ3YnSN/sUXshbA Received: by 10.38.206.72 with SMTP id d72mr1278997rng; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.3 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5b0444b5041019144217cdbd99@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:42:10 +0200 From: Tim Dettloff To: current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: pxe-install on FreeBSD 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tim Dettloff List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:42:14 -0000 Hi. On 5.2.1-RELEASE i could just copy /boot from the boot-only iso to my tftp-sever, compile pxeboot with LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=YES and I was ready to pxeinstall. When I do the same with 5.3-RC1 the kernel wants to mount root from NFS instead of /dev/md0. What is the reason for this change? In addition it would really be nice if the iso contained a pxeboot build with LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT=YES in addition to the standard one. I imagine it is only a couple of lines extra in the makefile..? Tim Dettloff