From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 25 13:05:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40351065674 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A638FC13 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KMMzZ-0000LL-QZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:05:53 +0000 Received: from pool-138-88-95-210.res.east.verizon.net ([138.88.95.210]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:05:53 +0000 Received: from nightrecon by pool-138-88-95-210.res.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:05:53 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:07:31 -0400 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <4889BAE0.6030308@skoberne.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-138-88-95-210.res.east.verizon.net Sender: news Subject: Re: FreeBSD and ECC memory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@verizon.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 13:05:55 -0000 Michael Powell wrote: [snip] >> >> 1. So, what would you base your decision on? Is getting ECC worth losing >> 1GB of non-ECC memory? Oh - and the other criterion I forgot to mention. If the box in question is only being used by 1 or 2 people and can have downtime to fix defects whenever you want, non-ECC is a consideration. That being said, if it is a box depended upon by many people and expected to be reliable I'd spend the money on 4GB of ECC from the outset. The difference being I need to put up a box and move on to other things. Having to return and muck with complaints is a counter productive waste of time that could be better spent with new projects. [snip] > > Just my $.02 here. YMMV and all other standard disclaimers apply. :-) > -Mike >