From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 29 09:04:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F1316A4BF; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7AA43FBF; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:04:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@starjuice.net) Received: from sheldonh by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local (Exim 4.22) id 19slk6-0002cl-3C; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:04:54 +0200 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:04:54 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20030829160454.GQ5234@starjuice.net> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Watson , Mike Jakubik , Current References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Sheldon Hearn cc: Mike Jakubik cc: Current Subject: Re: buildworld failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:04:57 -0000 On (2003/08/29 11:48), Robert Watson wrote: > The differences here seem to be: > > (1) I'm using -O, not -O2 > (2) I'm optimizing -mcpu as pentiumpro, not pentium4 Isn't pentium4 a known-broken optimization at the moment? Ciao, Sheldon.