From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 6 11:14:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F43016A427 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3A943D75 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 11:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k36BE8KJ058671; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:14:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k36BE8lr058668; Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:14:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:14:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Karl Ma In-Reply-To: <42a5f58c0604060143g5e68e806r870761a1beeefbb5@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20060406131337.M58398@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <42a5f58c0604060143g5e68e806r870761a1beeefbb5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Giving more CPU time to a swapping process? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:14:18 -0000 > running for more than a few hours. > In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I > did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it > takes more than 30 mins. > > How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? How can I this will not speed up disk drive which already works at 100%.