Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:17:32 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        jmb@FreeBSD.ORG (Jonathan M. Bresler)
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com, chat@hub.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: +path +analysis +branch
Message-ID:  <199709260317.UAA26774@usr05.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <199709251652.JAA28305@hub.freebsd.org> from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at Sep 25, 97 09:52:03 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > "completeness" in the rigorous mathematical sense.  Look up "+branch
> > +path +analysis" on AltaVista, or read the book "code complete" for a
> > higher level overview.  If you do the AltaVista thing, you will at
> > least get a useful tool in C++ for processing C code and producing
> > test code out of it.  8-).
> 
> 	ROFL.....
> 
> 	Word count: branch: 716944; path: 1023858; analysis: 2949206
> 
> 	but i did get a link to an interesting article
> 	http://asic.union.edu/237/Projects/Glynn_Hammond/PentPPro.htm

Did you forget the "+" signs?

There are only 6050 articles if you use the "+" signs.  I didn't see the
C++ tool for generating code coverage tests for C code, but mostly
because I didn't refine the search.  It's in comp.sources somewhere,
since it was posted to usenet.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709260317.UAA26774>