From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 7 8:57: 5 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8630E37B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:57:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-52.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC83943FBF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:57:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF6D66B37; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:57:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 76205126C; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:57:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:57:01 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Vallo Kallaste Cc: Jeff Roberson , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE ok again. feedback please? Message-ID: <20030307165701.GE49729@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030304011700.C62398-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20030306204421.GA5095@kevad.internal> <20030307074107.GA1230@kevad.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307074107.GA1230@kevad.internal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 09:41:07AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > > All interactive tasks are very responsive. My nice -5'd looping process > > > is getting 70% of the cpu and my compile is taking the rest. nice +20 may > > > not behave as well as in sched_4bsd right now. I'm going to work on that. > Althought much better, KDE is still almost unusable, XFree and KDE > startup takes a lot more time and starting plain xterm under KDE > takes x3 time than usual. When I kill one of the seti processes, all > comes down to normal. The one remaining seti process takes 53% of > CPU constantly. Don't know how top calculates process CPU usage, but > if the 100% is spread over the two processors, then the seti process > monopolises one of the processors constantly. Doesn't matter will it > run nice 19 or idprio 31. As noted in Jeff's original mail, niced processes do not behave nicely yet. Kris --KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+aM9cWry0BWjoQKURArVjAKCfpNvMc4NWTJxMX1gA8+v9KDH4cgCggfgp Mn5LpicchG93XeCJ0P6nG6U= =EKKF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KlAEzMkarCnErv5Q-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message