From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 08:26:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BCF16A4CE; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from park.rambler.ru (park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E825343FBF; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:26:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Received: from is (is.park.rambler.ru [81.19.64.102]) by park.rambler.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hB3GQhWU011364; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:26:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from is@rambler-co.ru) Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 19:26:42 +0300 (MSK) From: Igor Sysoev X-Sender: is@is To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A page fault in subr_turnstile.c:propogate_priority() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 16:26:50 -0000 On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > >> > Igor Sysoev wrote: > > >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to > > >> >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still > > >> >> causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority(). > > >> >> I have core dump and can send debug output. > > >> > > > >> > Go ahead and load up kernel.debug and the core dump in gdb -k, and show us > > >> > the backtrace. Also, do you have any idea about more specific circumstances > > >> > that will cause this problem? Thanks! > > >> > > >> Actually, please try http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/turnstile.patch > > > > > > I've applied patch. > > > Now it's a second fault. > > > > This is the same fault. Did you just apply this patch today or did > > you apply an earlier version of it a while ago? I just updated it > > two days ago. > > In I sent trace before > the patch. It seems to me that it's singe fault. > > Then I applied patch I saw the double fault. This trace I sent in > . Sorry, I missed your question. I've got and applied the patch today. Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/