From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 22 12:30:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E703C37B401; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from birch.ripe.net (birch.ripe.net [193.0.1.96])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D861843FBF; Thu, 22 May 2003 12:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marks@ripe.net)
Received: from laptop.6bone.nl (cow.ripe.net [193.0.1.239])
	by birch.ripe.net (8.12.9/8.11.6) with SMTP id h4MJU6Vn019558;
	Thu, 22 May 2003 21:30:06 +0200
Received: (nullmailer pid 1263 invoked by uid 1000);
	Thu, 22 May 2003 19:30:05 -0000
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 21:30:05 +0200
From: Mark Santcroos <marks@ripe.net>
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Message-ID: <20030522193004.GA1073@laptop.6bone.nl>
References: <20030522100612.X95471@root.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030522100612.X95471@root.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Handles: MS6-6BONE, MS18417-RIPE
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FBSD 5.1b2 Inst. Results on Dell i8500
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 19:30:09 -0000

On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:13:54AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> No, please do not add this patch.  It was authored by Mark Santcroos
> <marks@ripe.net> and is a reduction in correctness.  See this message
> where the correct thing to do is to add RefOf() and DerefOf() to the ASL.

Note that I haven't verified it for all cases though, but it most probably 
is the key to it.

Mark

-- 
Mark Santcroos                    RIPE Network Coordination Centre
http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/    New Projects Group/TTM