From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 22:52:14 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C7D5316A4B3; Wed,  1 Oct 2003 22:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B594043F85; Wed,  1 Oct 2003 22:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA15270;
	Thu, 2 Oct 2003 15:52:10 +1000
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 15:50:48 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200310012132.h91LWgF2042513@repoman.freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20031002155026.I8636@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <200310012132.h91LWgF2042513@repoman.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 timeout.9
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 05:52:14 -0000

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Warner Losh wrote:

> imp         2003/10/01 14:32:42 PDT
>
>   FreeBSD src repository
>
>   Modified files:
>     share/man/man9       timeout.9
>   Log:
>   Looks like I misread the callout code.  We do not seem to hold the
>   callout lock while the callout is happening.  So the serialization
>   that I thought was happening isn't.  Therefore, remove the part of the
>   bugs that says this.  Leave in the other bug as it is very hard to
>   work around (impossible?).
>
>   Fix various typos.
>
>   Also note that timeout/untimeout are considered to be the old interface and
>   the callout interface should be used insetad.
>
>   Submitted by: bde (first two) and wollman (third)

Thanks.

Bruce