From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Aug 27 10:36:56 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FE21084002; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B032C8937C; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w7RAXRLr097467; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:33:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:33:27 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Kyle Evans cc: Alan Somers , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers Subject: Re: svn commit: r337497 - in head: . contrib/mdocml contrib/tnftp/src etc/root share/skel tools/tools/nanobsd/pcengines/Files/root tools/tools/nanobsd/rescue/Files/root usr.bin/mail usr.bin/man usr.bin... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201808081924.w78JOKLP061364@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:33:27 +0300 (MSK) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:36:56 -0000 On Fri, 24 Aug 2018, Kyle Evans wrote: [snip] > >> Any chance you'd consider `less -E` for mergemaster, instead of > >> unsalted less? After going through a second round of updates since > >> this, that one feels super repetitive as you end up with two > >> keystrokes at the end per file that differs as opposed to the previous > >> one. This is pretty nit-picky, so I won't be upset if you say no. =) > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Kyle Evans > > > > > > Hmm, "-E" would make sense for mergemaster, even though I hate that > > behavior for man. But if mergemaster's pager is going to use different > > options than other applications, then it also should get its own variable; > > mergemaster should use MERGEMASTERPAGER the way that man uses MANPAGER. > > Agree? > > I'm inclined to agree on both counts. While I don't like a > proliferation of things to set to override defaults like this in the > general case, it seems to make sense for mergemaster. The application > of pager here is a different use case than most. What about freebsd-update then? Usually one should type 'q' twice on two empty lists there. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------