Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:49:19 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs Message-ID: <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200503091838.06322.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200503091838.06322.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:38:06PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Hello! > > The respected manual contain dire warnings, but the Google search suggests, > the situation is not *that* gloomy. > > For example, according to http://kerneltrap.org/node/652 , nullfs was used on > Bento-cluster two years ago in 2003. nullfs seems to work fine, unionfs is very fragile and easily exploded. > Is anybody working on this file-systems? Any plans, rumours? > > What about the `union' option to regular mounts? Is that safe to use? Yes. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050310004919.GA34206>