From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri May 22 16:54:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA20321 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Fri, 22 May 1998 16:54:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA20268 for ; Fri, 22 May 1998 16:54:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA05785; Fri, 22 May 1998 16:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805222354.QAA05785@implode.root.com> To: Nicole cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Gigabit FreeBSD In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 22 May 1998 09:47:43 PDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 16:54:24 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >via mv and ftping, (so far I have reached 15.6MB/s via ncftp) and I have planned > some NFS tests. However I would like to know what tests would best show off Fr >eeBSD and the Gigbit ethernet. > > I think that this writeup could help a great deal in showing FreeBSD as a Real >World, we can play with the Big Toys OS. However I would like to know what tests > would best show off FreeBSD and the Gigbit ethernet. FTP and similar things involve disk I/O and thus aren't good ways to measure TCP performance. Most of us use the "ttcp" utility to measure this. Unfortunately, I don't think ttcp has been made into a 'port' yet. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message