From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 15 12:35:14 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA01992 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:35:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01984 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:35:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA19311; Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:35:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:35:11 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199902152035.MAA19311@apollo.backplane.com> To: "John S. Dyson" Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inode / exec_map interlock ? (follow up) References: <199902152033.PAA01773@y.dyson.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : :BTW, have you found/fixed the non-blocking swap pager problem yet. It seems :that existing bugs should be fixed first. What non-blocking swap pager problem? this is the third time you've brought this up, and the third time I've asked you to explain what the frag you are talking about, and the the third time I have not received any sort of explanation. -Matt :-- :John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, :dyson@iquest.net | it makes one look stupid :jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. : Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message